tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5262551834653675707.post4395753820077012854..comments2011-04-22T04:40:50.674-07:00Comments on IBM Testarossa Compiler: SPECjbb2005 Bragging Rights for IBM J9Derek Inglishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12312901838031201613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5262551834653675707.post-57512296636428106702009-01-30T14:04:00.000-08:002009-01-30T14:04:00.000-08:00Java is now Open Source. What is the point of IBM ...Java is now Open Source. What is the point of IBM maintaining a separate JVM? Why not give it up and contribute the enhacements to the open source version?<BR/><BR/>as a former OS/2 user I saw IBM's "not invented here" syndrome before.<BR/><BR/>It's as if supporting Openoffice.org or Sun's Java directly would make IBM somehow weaker.<BR/><BR/>FCNerd Progrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16328258490086439970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5262551834653675707.post-62677333069860130012008-12-11T15:59:00.000-08:002008-12-11T15:59:00.000-08:00Core comparisons are getting a bit weak, especiall...Core comparisons are getting a bit weak, especially considering CPU density is increasing. How about a socket or CPU count comparison. When it comes to data center footprint and power, that's what matters.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03995634623433092335noreply@blogger.com