Performance to Power Ratio score of 2066 overall ssj_ops/watt * running IBM J9.
* updated May 25, 2009 to point at updated IBM newblurb with new score
SPEC is a registered trademark and SPECpower_ssj is a trademark of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (see www.spec.org/spec/trademarks.html for all SPEC trademarks and service marks).
Friday, May 8, 2009
Monday, March 30, 2009
IBM J9 SPECjbb2005 results used in the Intel Nehalem launch
It's been fun following Intel's launch of the 2-socket Nehalem chip. This is the first time that I can remember having SPECjbb2005 results available on launch day using each of the 'big 3' JVMs.
Kudos to Oracle JRockit for having the first Nehalem based SPECjbb2005 results available on www.spec.org using a new P28.0.0. JVM.
The Sun HotSpot results using a new Java 6 Update 14 Performance Release are referenced here.
The IBM J9 result is 8-10% faster than the JRockit and HotSpot results .... not surprisingly Intel went with the J9 result on their Nehalem benchmark page.
Derek
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.
SPEC and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results referenced are current as of March 30, 2009. The SPECjbb2005 results have been submitted to SPEC for review. Upon successful review, the result will be posted at www.spec.org, which contains a complete list of published SPECjbb2005 results. SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
IBM BladeCenter HS22 (2 chips, 8 cores) SPECjbb2005 bops = 604,417, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 151,104.
Sun Branded Intel Xeon X5570 System (2 chips, 8 cores) SPECjbb2005 bops = 556,882, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 278,441.
PowerEdge M710 (2 chips, 8 cores) SPECjbb2005 bops = 549,197, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 274,599.
Kudos to Oracle JRockit for having the first Nehalem based SPECjbb2005 results available on www.spec.org using a new P28.0.0. JVM.
The Sun HotSpot results using a new Java 6 Update 14 Performance Release are referenced here.
The IBM J9 result is 8-10% faster than the JRockit and HotSpot results .... not surprisingly Intel went with the J9 result on their Nehalem benchmark page.
Derek
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.
SPEC and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results referenced are current as of March 30, 2009. The SPECjbb2005 results have been submitted to SPEC for review. Upon successful review, the result will be posted at www.spec.org, which contains a complete list of published SPECjbb2005 results. SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
IBM BladeCenter HS22 (2 chips, 8 cores) SPECjbb2005 bops = 604,417, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 151,104.
Sun Branded Intel Xeon X5570 System (2 chips, 8 cores) SPECjbb2005 bops = 556,882, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 278,441.
PowerEdge M710 (2 chips, 8 cores) SPECjbb2005 bops = 549,197, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 274,599.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
WebSphere is playing it cool, man !
An homage to John "cool man" Stecher.
When everyone knows you're the fastest, you can play it cool.
WebSphere Application Server V7.0 GA'd in October. A couple weeks later IBM publishes an overall leadership SPECjAppServer2004 score of 20179 JOPS@Standard. Now, a month later, if you google "SPECjAppServer2004 20179" you won't find a single hit ... well, maybe now you will. Hm, a little more digging and I see that SPEC uses different score formats depending on how the data is queried. The score is also reported as 20178.61 JOPS@Standard which does give me a couple of hits.
Damn, I thought WAS was going for the ultimate cool, man.
Derek "never going to be a cool man" Inglis
SPEC and SPECjAppServer are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of December 11th 2008.
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.
When everyone knows you're the fastest, you can play it cool.
WebSphere Application Server V7.0 GA'd in October. A couple weeks later IBM publishes an overall leadership SPECjAppServer2004 score of 20179 JOPS@Standard. Now, a month later, if you google "SPECjAppServer2004 20179" you won't find a single hit ... well, maybe now you will. Hm, a little more digging and I see that SPEC uses different score formats depending on how the data is queried. The score is also reported as 20178.61 JOPS@Standard which does give me a couple of hits.
Damn, I thought WAS was going for the ultimate cool, man.
Derek "never going to be a cool man" Inglis
SPEC and SPECjAppServer are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of December 11th 2008.
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
SPECjbb2005 Bragging Rights for IBM J9
With the release of IBM Java 6 SR3, and its availablility on Windows via Websphere Application Server 7.0.0.1, J9 has extended its SPECjbb2005 lead over JRockit to 11% on Intel and has trumped its own leading result on AMD by 10%.
IBM J9 has
Published results on Intel's Harpertown chip provide an interesting comparison of J9, JRockit and HotSpot. (Note the HotSpot number is using Sun's Java 6 _05 update. There hasn't been a publish with their faster _06 Performance update.)
J9's SR1 publish on the 3.16GHz Harpertown chip beats the more recent JRockit publish on the 3.33GHz chip. Also of interest are the uses of 32 and 64-bit JVMs. J9's 64-bit SR3 number beats JRockit by 11% and J9's 32-bit number beats JRockit by 6%.
J9 now has the leadership 8-core Intel number, the leadership 8-core AMD number and the overall leadership 8-core number using an IBM POWER6 chip.
With Sun's Niagara-2 processors having 8 cores per socket, Sun has published a number of leading per-socket scores. With the recent publish on IBM's Bladecenter LS42, IBM and J9 now claim the leadership 4-socket result:Sun is still leading the 2-socket category ... by 2% ... using twice the number of cores and 16 times the number of threads.
J9 has the overal leadership 16-core result as well as the leading x86 16-core result.
oh .. if you actually read this far and are wondering what we did in SR3. The 10% boost is from the Apache Harmony improvement to TreeMap discussed in David Dagastine's blog.
Derek
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.
SPEC and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results referenced are current as of December 10, 2008. The SPECjbb2005 results have been submitted to SPEC for review. Upon successful review, the result will be posted at www.spec.org, which contains a complete list of published SPECjbb2005 results. SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
1-core
IBM System i5 515 (1 chip, 1 core, 2 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 20615, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=20615
2-core
IBM System p 570 (1 chips, 2 cores, 4 thredas) SPECjbb2005 bops=88089, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=88089
4-core
IBM Power 570 (2 chips, 4 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops=205917, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=102959
IBM System X3350 (1 chip, 4 cores, 4 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 194256, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 97128
8-core
IBM Power 570 (4 chips, 8 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 402.923, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 100731.
IBM Bladecenter LS42 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops=382,339, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=191,170
IBM System x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 344,436, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 86,109.
IBM System x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 334,802, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 83,701.
IBM System x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 thredas) SPECjbb2005 bops = 323172, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 80793.
PRIMERGY RX200 S4 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads,) SPECjbb2005 bops = 316,728, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 79,182.
Sun Fire X4150 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 303297, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 75,824.
16-core
IBM Power 570 (8 chips, 16 cores, 32 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 867989, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 108499.
IBM Bladecenter LS42 (4 chips, 16 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 721843, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 180461.
Transport TX46 (4 chips, 16 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 659034, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 164759.
Sun Fire X4450 (4 chips, 16 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 464355, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 58044.
Sun Blade T6340 (2 chips, 16 cores, 128 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 388456, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 24279.
24-core
Sun Fire X4450 (4 chips, 24 cores, 24 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 531669, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 132917.
32-core
IBM Power 595 (16 chips, 32 cores, 64 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 1530343, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 95646.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 (4 chips, 32 cores, 256 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 692736, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 21648.
64-core
IBM Power 585 (32 chips, 64 cores, 128 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 3435485, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 107359.
IBM J9 has
- leadership 1,2,4,8,16,32 & 64-core results (IBM System p and System i)
- leadership 4 and 8-core Intel results
- leadership 8 and 16-core AMD results
- leadership 4-socket result
- leadership x86 2-socket result
Published results on Intel's Harpertown chip provide an interesting comparison of J9, JRockit and HotSpot. (Note the HotSpot number is using Sun's Java 6 _05 update. There hasn't been a publish with their faster _06 Performance update.)
J9's SR1 publish on the 3.16GHz Harpertown chip beats the more recent JRockit publish on the 3.33GHz chip. Also of interest are the uses of 32 and 64-bit JVMs. J9's 64-bit SR3 number beats JRockit by 11% and J9's 32-bit number beats JRockit by 6%.
J9 now has the leadership 8-core Intel number, the leadership 8-core AMD number and the overall leadership 8-core number using an IBM POWER6 chip.
With Sun's Niagara-2 processors having 8 cores per socket, Sun has published a number of leading per-socket scores. With the recent publish on IBM's Bladecenter LS42, IBM and J9 now claim the leadership 4-socket result:Sun is still leading the 2-socket category ... by 2% ... using twice the number of cores and 16 times the number of threads.
J9 has the overal leadership 16-core result as well as the leading x86 16-core result.
oh .. if you actually read this far and are wondering what we did in SR3. The 10% boost is from the Apache Harmony improvement to TreeMap discussed in David Dagastine's blog.
Derek
The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.
SPEC and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results referenced are current as of December 10, 2008. The SPECjbb2005 results have been submitted to SPEC for review. Upon successful review, the result will be posted at www.spec.org, which contains a complete list of published SPECjbb2005 results. SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
1-core
IBM System i5 515 (1 chip, 1 core, 2 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 20615, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=20615
2-core
IBM System p 570 (1 chips, 2 cores, 4 thredas) SPECjbb2005 bops=88089, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=88089
4-core
IBM Power 570 (2 chips, 4 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops=205917, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=102959
IBM System X3350 (1 chip, 4 cores, 4 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 194256, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 97128
8-core
IBM Power 570 (4 chips, 8 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 402.923, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 100731.
IBM Bladecenter LS42 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops=382,339, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM=191,170
IBM System x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 344,436, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 86,109.
IBM System x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 334,802, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 83,701.
IBM System x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 thredas) SPECjbb2005 bops = 323172, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 80793.
PRIMERGY RX200 S4 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads,) SPECjbb2005 bops = 316,728, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 79,182.
Sun Fire X4150 (2 chips, 8 cores, 8 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 303297, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 75,824.
16-core
IBM Power 570 (8 chips, 16 cores, 32 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 867989, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 108499.
IBM Bladecenter LS42 (4 chips, 16 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 721843, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 180461.
Transport TX46 (4 chips, 16 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 659034, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 164759.
Sun Fire X4450 (4 chips, 16 cores, 16 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 464355, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 58044.
Sun Blade T6340 (2 chips, 16 cores, 128 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 388456, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 24279.
24-core
Sun Fire X4450 (4 chips, 24 cores, 24 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 531669, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 132917.
32-core
IBM Power 595 (16 chips, 32 cores, 64 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 1530343, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 95646.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 (4 chips, 32 cores, 256 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 692736, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 21648.
64-core
IBM Power 585 (32 chips, 64 cores, 128 threads) SPECjbb2005 bops = 3435485, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 107359.
Labels:
AMD,
Harpertown,
HotSpot,
IBM,
Intel,
J9,
JRockit,
Shanghai,
SPECjbb2005,
Websphere
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)